It is devastating’: the way thirty captive beluga whales are now pawns in dispute over animal welfare.
Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie Botts is an cute small “ham sandwich”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a large but very loyal friend. Zephyr has “endless energy” and wiggles like a worm. Lillooet the beluga is the “loving presence” with a kind nature.
Thirty captive marine mammals in a Canadian amusement park have become pawns in a struggle between a closed attraction, local and national governments and welfare campaigners.
But those most familiar with the whales say the heated controversy over their destiny often overlooks the complexities of the whales who, after spending their lives in confinement, have been thoroughly researched by the humans who interact with them daily.
After the national authorities prevented the transfer of the belugas to China, the controversial facility near Niagara Falls where they are kept threatened to euthanize them unless the government covers the expense of keeping them alive. The nation’s marine resources official has rejected that ultimatum, placing the 30 whales in an increasingly precarious circumstance.
Highly Cognitive Marine Mammals
Experts say that beluga whales’ neural makeup, along with their mimicry abilities, intellectual tasks and communal behavior indicate they are remarkably smart animals – something one caretaker discovered first-hand.
Burgess spent three years as a marine mammal specialist, a role that involved earning the trust of the sea creatures.
“Establishing those relationships over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of care. At the outset, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so wonderful and fulfilling.”
Burgess knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was nevertheless amazed by the nuances and quirks in their dispositions. She developed a particular love for a pair of whales with opposing natures.
“One whale chose me. Cleo required effort,” she said. “Both transformed the way I perceive relationships.”
Public Concerns and Facility Decline
Burgess’s connection with the whales evolved against a background of growing public opposition to their enclosure.
During her tenure at the facility, seven belugas and the park’s single orca, the orca, passed away. In all, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a number which the park links to expected lifespan, but which campaigners say points to the substandard environment in which they were kept.
The facility did not open to the public over the summer, but Burgess says she observed directly effects of the shutdown. “Structural materials is falling apart from the enclosures because they’re in disrepair and not being fixed. The whales are exploratory and so they take pieces and swim around with pieces in their mouth. It’s heartbreaking to see.”
The park did not comment to a inquiry, but earlier claimed: “The whales … obtain far higher quality medical attention and constant supervision than any individual in the UK, or anywhere else.”
Uncertain Future and Proposed Solutions
The former employee was dismissed from the facility in recent months following the passing of a beluga, an sick beluga the park staff had to put down. She said the park thought details of the incident were shared to the news outlets and she was released shortly thereafter.
The lack of clarity over the whales’ future has left her and staff members in despair. She says the park’s threat to euthanize its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “extremely difficult” endeavor, adding any attempts to put down even a individual beluga would require “considerable manpower”, trucks and machinery.
“It cannot happen in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.
She advocates for demands for the whales to be removed immediately from the park, with its failing enclosures and dwindling staff.
In late September, the nation’s government official rejected a bid to transfer the whales to China.
“To approve the proposal would have meant a perpetual situation in enclosure and a return to public entertainment,” the minister stated. “As Canadians, we know that belugas should be in the wild, not in enclosures for our amusement. I could not in ethical standing permit an transfer that would prolong the treatment these belugas have suffered.”
But the former trainer said the official’s remarks reflect a broader lack of awareness of the circumstances of life for belugas born in captivity.
“The society needs to realize these are whales that have spent their whole lives in confinement and they will need human care for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “People just don’t realize that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘end operations’.”
Sanctuary Proposal and Continuing Discussion
As authorities struggle to find a answer, suggestions have surfaced, some of which have minimal feasibility. An idea called for the belugas to be released into the open waters of northern regions – where whales are a key source of nourishment for Inuit communities.
A suggested protected area in the province of Nova Scotia, which recently received regulatory clearance, has shown to be contentious. The future facility, which includes 100 acres of protected cove, doesn’t yet exist. Supporters remain optimistic that it could ultimately represent a permanent resolution for some of the whales.
But, Burgess says, among caretakers she’s discussed with, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “merely an experiment” in the whales’ future.
Others say the prospect of a sanctuary indicates a broader global shift away from captive facilities and could represent a workable plan in the near future.
Charles Vinick, leader of the initiative, said the location will replicate the intellectual stimulation and diet the whales get from trainers, albeit in a much larger environment. He said after the well-being of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|