🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold move to ban social networking access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves around the globe. Officials, safety advocates, and guardians are monitoring with great interest to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a rising chorus of nations are considering comparable bans.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister stating that mobile devices and apps are "robbing our youngsters' youth". Legislation could be enacted next year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to safeguard children from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to confirm the identity and age of social media account holders. The media minister have stated that an similar ban is "one of the options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the president has asked parliament to approve a law increasing the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a similar action, including an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has recommended guardians to prevent their youngsters from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has adopted a non-binding motion demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 except if parental consent is provided. While it warns of the "compulsive" nature of these platforms, the step does not enact mandatory rules.

"A clear age restriction is a useful starting point," commented one European lawmaker supporting the resolution.

The UK: A Cautious Approach

Across Britain, the administration has not ruled out a potential ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but stressing any action must be "grounded in strong evidence".

Last year, interest gathered behind a bill to introduce controls on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the topic.

Advocacy groups have expressed warnings. A prominent charity founded by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after encountering disturbing social media material suggests that a blanket age ban may not improve online safety and could lead to a "cliff edge" of exposure when users reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to create platforms and apps that are safe and suitable for minors," said a prominent child protection advocate.

America: A State-by-State Landscape

In the United States, regulation is mostly happening at the state government level against a backdrop of country-wide gridlock.

• Utah requires adult approval for under-18s to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has signed a measure banning those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• The state of Virginia has approved a regulation restricting under-16s to one hour of social media access per day, with any further time dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also passed bills mandating parental consent for teenagers to set up social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from certain individuals to mimic Australia's lead, a US-wide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Apart from Europe and the US, additional states are likewise taking action.

• The Malaysian government aims to restrict social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, global organizations take a more nuanced tone. A major UN agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "might have unintended consequences". The body points out that online platforms can be a "critical link" for vulnerable children and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to prioritize safety.

As this international conversation continues, the steps of Australia and several other countries indicate that governments internationally are no longer willing to delay for the industry to act voluntarily.